Monday, 10 June 2013

Retaining Wall

This photo shows an ongoing issue for us i.e. what to do with the gap? How do we best connect the house with the backyard?
(On a tiny budget. Before even looking at the gap, we’ve already exceeded our retaining wall provisional cost item i.e. the cost of a good 2nd-hand small family vehicle, by the high-end price of a new small family vehicle – we’d like to stop well before we hit the grand saloon comparison stages!)

WP_20130610_002

Below are the quotes and possible solutions.
(Apologies for some pretty bad pictures here)

1. Complete the wall with concrete sleepers, build a platform out with stairs leading down the side of the wall i.e.

image

Pros:

  • Cheapest ($9k)
  • Gets us to the backyard (which may be the future pool area)

Cons:

  • No engineering cost factored in – would need to be certified under the existing certification for the wall – which may mean an additional cost
  • Does not really connect the backyard – it would probably end up feeling like two separate properties.

2. Additional retaining wall bay and 2m wide concrete tiled stairs. Timber balustrade with stainless wire.

image

Pros:

  • Should look very nice
  • Will integrate the two areas without making it feel like two separate properties
  • Waterproofed

Cons:

  • Expensive (another new vehicle – $16k)
  • No engineering cost factored in – would need to be certified under the existing certification for the wall – which may mean an additional cost

3. Additional 800mm retaining wall bay on each side. 2.5m wide coloured, concrete stairs (Boral range). Timber balustrade.

image

Pros:

  • Should look nice
  • Engineering cost is also included
  • Will integrate the two areas without making it feel like two separate properties
  • Award winning, home show advertising, landscape company

Cons:

  • Reasonably expensive (student vehicle – $13k)
  • Not rendered
  • Not tiled
  • No stainless wire in the balustrade, timber only
  • No mention of waterproofing in quote
  • No allowance for rock excavation in quote

4. Quick, with a hint of dodgy concrete, core filled blocks with timber external stairs on steel frame.

image

Pros:

  • (Possibly) cheap ($4.3k for the core filled block retaining only – still sourcing a quote for the staircase)

Cons:

  • Will possibly not look good
  • Not rendered (yet)
  • Tricky dead space under staircase – we would actually prefer this being covered with concrete block work.
  • Timber stairs on steel frame may not be a good solution – can possibly get concrete formed stairs instead, but cost could end up being the same as the above two quotes?
  • No mention of waterproofing in quote

5. Complete the wall and forget about the extra 250-300sqm backyard…for now (~$5k)

6. Build a 1.8m high raised pool bang in the middle, use the pool walls to retain the 4.1m gap. Step down to rest of backyard down both/either side(s) of 8m long pool. (Unknown cost)

The saga continues…

On the upside, we absolutely love the roof line from the back of the property!

No comments:

Post a Comment